Criteria | Guidance | Evidence & Scoring | Importance & Applicability |
---|---|---|---|
Criteria 3.2: Criteria 3.2: Discussions to establish the terms of cultivation or collection activities promote dialogue, trust and long-term collaboration 3.2.5 In case of high levels of producer dependency on the natural raw materials, strategies are in place to minimize any significant negative impact of the termination of sourcing relationships on producers and their communities in cultivation and wild collection areas. |
This strategy may include the empowerment of producers/collectors aimed at looking for other market opportunities or income diversification to reduce dependency to the OaS and to the activity itself (this can also be the diversification of commercial offers around the raw material: processed raw material with added value, touristic or handicraft development, etc). For termination of long-term sourcing relationships, precautions should be taken such as a medium or long advance notice as much as possible (e.g. at least three months before harvest time)and providing support when only a short notice period is possible. A transparent termination clause in a supplier agreement should be stated in writing and agreed upon between parties. When sub-suppliers are negotiating and directly involved in pricing with producers, this requirement will also apply at their level. This indicator is applicable to the relationship between OaS and producers, when they're both involved in the scope of the assessment. If the OaS is the producer in the supply chain, this indicator is not applicable. | DOCUMENTATION INTERVIEWS 0 - No strategy in place to minimise any significant negative impact of the termination of long-term sourcing relationships on communities in sourcing areas, or short notice for end of supply agreement without any support for vulnerable producers/communities |
Importance Regular stepwise Applicability |
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer